Fixed synthetic example
Sample report, not your result
This is a precomputed example from an AI-generated portrait, not a visitor photo.
Free shows two measurement values and a short public explanation. Paid adds the four other values, composite score, full explanations, score composition, measurement overlay, PDF and an included verification retake. Payment interprets the same scan; it does not improve the detector.
Example score
4.9 / 10
Closest to center
In this photograph, Canthal tilt is within the editorial reference band, and Interocular ratio is within the editorial reference band.
Largest gaps
The largest weighted gaps in this score are Facial symmetry and Gonial angle.
Score driver details
- Facial symmetry
- 0.87 has an editorial center of 1.00 and tolerance 0.30; this metric is bounded 0.00–1.00, 0.13 below its center. Contribution: 1.53 / 2.70 points. The example compares paired landmarks across its visible facial midline. Compare: For a comparable photo, face the lens squarely with balanced front lighting.
- Gonial angle
- 139.0° is within the editorial interval 102.0°–142.0° (center 122.0°), 17.0° above its center. Contribution: 0.20 / 1.35 points. The example averages angles at the two visible jaw-corner landmarks. Compare: Compare with the jaw relaxed, posture neutral and both sides evenly visible.
Points reward proximity to the editorial center, not simply being inside the interval. These choices are not population norms. A value at an interval edge earns zero contribution.
A retake checks consistency under another setup; it does not establish anatomical accuracy or promise a higher score.
What it does not establish
A single photograph and editorial geometry cannot establish attractiveness, anatomy, a diagnosis, or the cause of any measured gap.
How the 4.9 score is composed
A fixed 1.00 base plus up to 9 points from the six measurements.
- Facial symmetry
- +1.53 / 2.70
- Canthal tilt
- +0.81 / 1.35
- Facial width-to-height
- +0.60 / 1.35
- Gonial angle
- +0.20 / 1.35
- Interocular ratio
- +0.45 / 0.90
- Middle-to-lower third
- +0.30 / 1.35
1.00 base + contributions = 4.89 (displayed as 4.9)
- Facial symmetry
0.87
The example compares paired landmarks across its visible facial midline. The example’s paired-landmark match is inside the editorial interval.
Photo factors to check: Angle, expression and landmark placement can affect the comparison.
Retake guidance: For a comparable photo, face the lens squarely with balanced front lighting.
Context: This bounded landmark heuristic does not establish anatomical symmetry.
- Canthal tilt
8.2°
The example averages eye-corner angles against the line joining the inner eye corners. The example’s angle is inside the editorial interval.
Photo factors to check: Pure head roll is compensated; visible corner placement and pose still matter.
Retake guidance: Compare an eye-level photo with both inner and outer eye corners unobstructed.
Context: An angle from a photograph is not an attractiveness assessment.
- Facial width-to-height
1.65
The example divides visible cheek width by brow-to-upper-lip distance. The example’s width-to-height ratio is inside the editorial interval.
Photo factors to check: Perspective and selected landmark positions affect this visible proportion.
Retake guidance: Use more camera distance and similar framing for the comparison.
Context: The ratio cannot separate perspective effects from underlying proportions.
- Gonial angle
139.0°
The example averages angles at the two visible jaw-corner landmarks. The example’s front-photo angle is inside the editorial interval.
Photo factors to check: Jaw visibility, posture and landmark positions affect the front-photo estimate.
Retake guidance: Compare with the jaw relaxed, posture neutral and both sides evenly visible.
Context: This estimate is not a clinical measurement of the underlying jaw.
- Interocular ratio
0.27
The example divides inner-eye landmark spacing by visible cheek width. The example’s spacing-to-width ratio is inside the editorial interval.
Photo factors to check: Face angle and the visible-width landmarks affect the ratio.
Retake guidance: Keep the lens straight ahead and the face centered for comparison.
Context: It describes a proportion in this image, not the cause of that proportion.
- Middle-to-lower third
1.23
The example divides brow-to-nose-base distance by nose-base-to-chin distance. The example’s middle/lower ratio is inside the editorial interval; 1.00 means equal segments.
Photo factors to check: Camera height, chin position and expression can affect the segments.
Retake guidance: Use an eye-level lens, neutral chin and relaxed mouth for comparison.
Context: The hairline is not measured; this is not a full three-thirds assessment.
Example limitations
Limitation: this deterministic photograph-based heuristic is not a scientific, clinical, or population-ranking assessment.
Retake: Use a front-facing photo with even light, a relaxed expression, and enough camera distance to reduce lens distortion.