Free attractiveness test and face rating

The test maps facial landmarks and calculates bilateral symmetry, canthal tilt, facial width-to-height ratio, an approximate visible gonial angle, interocular ratio, and the balance between the middle and lower facial thirds. Those values are combined into a PSL-style score.

The geometry is real; the conversion into one attractiveness number is a product heuristic. No accepted scientific formula turns a face into a universal beauty score, and a still photograph cannot capture expression, voice, familiarity, styling or cultural preference.

1. 1

   Choose a clear photo

   Use one front-facing face at eye level with even light and a neutral expression.

2. 2

   Run the model locally

   The face-landmark model reads the image in browser memory; the image and landmarks are not sent to a server.

3. 3

   Inspect the result

   See two measurement values free, then decide whether to unlock the composite score, remaining four values and deeper report detail.

No face test can answer “how attractive am I?” for every person you might meet. This test measures selected proportions in one photograph under fixed rules. It cannot observe your voice, expression in motion, warmth, familiarity or personal style, and it cannot know another person’s preferences.

The composite is an editorial heuristic rather than a scientific beauty measurement. A result closer to the chosen reference targets is not evidence that people will find you more attractive. Use the free measurement values and face shape to understand what the photo shows; the paid report adds the composite score and further detail, not certainty about attraction.

Accuracy has two separate meanings here. Landmark placement can be consistent on a clear photograph, while the attractiveness interpretation remains subjective. A tilted head, close wide-angle selfie, smile, crop or hard shadow can alter visible geometry even when the person has not changed.

• Compare only photos taken under similar conditions.
• Use the individual measurements as descriptive signals, not diagnoses.
• Do not treat the number as a population rank or statement of personal worth.
• Close the page if appearance scoring is making you feel worse rather than curious.

Read the measurement rows before the headline number. Each row names a feature, shows the value found in the photo and gives the calculator’s reference target. A higher overall score simply means these six measurements landed closer to those targets. It does not tell you what every viewer will prefer.

Small decimal differences rarely mean much on their own. Turning the head affects visible width and symmetry, tilting it changes vertical proportions, and smiling shifts the lower face. If a result surprises you, take another photo under the same conditions and check whether it holds.

• Read the disclosed metric definition.
• Check whether the photo met the capture guidance.
• Compare only results made by the same calculator.
• Treat small differences as photo-sensitive.
• Keep the number separate from self-worth.

A phone camera can be technically sharp and still be poor measurement input. A close selfie exaggerates the nose and center of the face while compressing the sides. Portrait mode may alter edges, beauty filters can move landmarks, and overhead light can hide one jaw corner. Step back, use modest zoom if the camera allows it, keep the lens level with the eyes, and leave the entire face inside the frame.

The detector also needs one visible face. Group photographs, sunglasses over the eye corners, hair across the jaw, extreme expressions and partial profiles can prevent a stable result. If the image is not usable, the tool rejects it instead of producing a doubtful score. You can then retake the photo without sending it anywhere.

• Use one adult face in the frame.
• Remove filters and face-warping effects.
• Keep both eye corners and the jaw visible.
• Choose soft, even front light.
• Avoid screenshots of compressed social-media images.

This calculator is for looking at one image in private. There is no leaderboard, social profile, stranger matching or database of submitted faces. The formula can describe the photo, but it cannot support a public ranking of people.

A still image also leaves out expression in motion, voice, familiarity, personal style and cultural context. The result only reports six proportions visible in the photo.